Question: Should you be removing “bad” backlinks to your site?

This is a question I get asked a fair amount and there unfortunately isn’t a definitive answer. The reason there is no solid answer is that as always not all websites are created equal.

quality links
Lets first look at where the question comes from.

The Google “Bad Link” Update / Penguin

Penguin as an update grappled with killing web spam, this included wiping out the value of “unnatural links” – which incorrectly people read as irellevant, sitewide and spam links.

“Unnatural links” are those which are created by non-organic means or which appear thousands of times, so things like paid links and links with the same anchor text (thousands of times in an effect to spam or trick google) are not natural. Yes, in many cases this can involve them being irrelevant, sitewide and spammy but not always – indeed I find the correlation to be quite low.

So should you remove these “unnatural links”?

This is the billion dollar question. Given the spate of link warnings Google Webmasters is issuing, I would say you should simply be more aware of what you are doing.

Low quality links which you’ve created with the same anchor text across many websites and blogs is unnatural and the links have been devalued. It’s the same with article websites, press release websites and some other website types (eg classifieds). The answer to the question is that they have already been devalued, yes they maybe so again but you’ve already been hit by the update through them. So in this case no you shouldn’t put your effort into removing the links.

The real question is what should you be doing post-penguin and post-panda?

The answer is really simple.

If you get a notice for “unnatural linking” take a look where it could be coming from. If it’s scraper sites send google and bing a spam notification / take down notice. Usually within a few days they will remove the site from listings. This also shows you are aware of the issue and working on it. This is a much easier way than contacting a webmaster of a scraper site in most cases. If the unnatural links are within an article or someones blog post go back and ask for a “nofollow” or to remove the link – but don’t put too much time and effort into this, it’s not worth it.

Stop looking outside your box. Your website is your passion it should be number one on your list of websites to care for, so do it. Create fresh relevant content whenever possible, ensure that sites you link to are relevant and ensure that any navigation you have is easy to use. Also make your content accessible to everyone.

Stop looking outside your box. Make your website perfect before looking to the outside for help. People won’t link to your site unless it feels good and full of great content – your website should feel trustworthy and updated on a regular basis.

From now on only build links inside your container, niche. Don’t go off leaving blogs on SEO blogs, like SEO Andy, unless you are in the marketing industry. If you are a shop you have a clear niche to target – so whether its forums, blogs or reciprocal linking – do it in your niche.

Finally, always remember quality over quantity. This is both for your own website content and creating links. Think carefully about what you are saying and doing, it reflects on your business.

If you are still stuck on removing links, check out this article by distilled on removing bad links.

2 Comments on “Question: Should you be removing “bad” backlinks to your site?”

  1. So far, in the last week I’ve received over 30 emails from a company called iProspect, claiming to be on behalf of British Gas, saying “as part of our ongoing SEO campaign — we [are] looking to edit or remove some of the backlinks pointing to the [British Gas] domain name.”In their email they wrote, “Please note that we are not trying to imply that your website is of fault for violating any guidelines, …”Good, because I’m not.They continued, “…but that we have advised British Gas should remove any historic links that they acquired which could be interpreted as paid or intended to manipulate PageRank.”Now, here’s the thing. I think that it is very clear from even the briefest of readings of both my blog posts that neither are ‘paid for’ posts nor are either designed to manipulate Google’s PageRank algorithm. Each post contains a single link, in the context of the post. One post is very complimentary of British Gas’s customer service; the other isn’t. I think that offers a fair balance, to be honest.This request struck me instead as more of an exercise in removing links containing less-than complimentary reviews of British Gas’s work. (Perhaps I’m being too cynical.) Which is disappointing, given the open nature of the Web, how much free speech is both valued and upheld in this country, and that one of these posts actually complimented the service that I received from Scottish Gas. It still sits in my mind as one of the best interactions I’ve ever had with a Scottish Gas employee.And so, as my blog is not “violating any guidelines” I’m not removing the links. Genuine posts. Genuine and useful links.However, ironically the emails requesting the links to be removed are now automatically being redirected to my spam folder in Outlook.

    1. Hi Gareth, thanks for the comment
      I agree that this is an over zealous move on their part, it is likely the issue I explain about about not knowing what “unnatural links” actually means. Yes it’s about the manipulation of links but if a link is natural then it’s all fine.

      but of course the other side of the coin as you mention is, is this a move to get rid of a bad review… I know myself what it’s like getting those emails (i get them from a certain company quite often).

      My advice is don’t do anything, you are not breaking an guidelines and you have a right to free speech on the free and open internet. A bad review is a bad review – its how they deal with it that matters.

      But i do think this could just be a case of being over active and misunderstanding what the words mean.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *